Federated States of Micronesia

Department of Transportation, Communications and Infrastructure

 


Home Up Contact Search Engines

 

 

Terms of Reference:  Micro-Projects

e-Pacifika: Facilitating National ICT Strategies for Development

Objective 

The micro-projects financed under e-Pacifika are intended to build upon the action items identified in the e-Pacifika National Workshop.  The National Committee/Council is requested to seek micro-project proposals that will have a long-term positive impact on ICT development in the country.  ICT development can involve increased awareness or usage of appropriate technology, policy formulation and implementation. 

Description and Criteria

The criteria listed below are provided to assist in the preparation and evaluation of proposals.

Due to budget limitations e-Pacifika, and to ensure that all countries benefit, can only allocate a maximum of USD$7,000 in each country.  This allocation per country could be dispersed to one project or several.  The funding is not earmarked for each country and will only be disbursed for approved proposals.  These funds should constitute only a portion of the total micro-project budget.  Specifically, it is expected that other contributions, either as cash or in-kind form at least 40% of the total project budget.  Proposals, which can provide higher levels of other funding, will be viewed favorably.

Where possible and practical the National ICT Committee/Council will be asked to vet the proposals and make recommendations before the proposal is submitted to e-Pacifika.  

In-kind contributions include: time devoted to the project by persons who are not compensated in any other way for their work on the project and/or donated space, services or supplies directly related to the implementation of the project.

Only non-government or not-for-profit organizations are eligible to receive funding under this program.

Project proposals are evaluated on a first-come first-served basis.

Sustainability – the initiative started will have a long-term positive impact for ICT development in the country.  Applicants are requested to provide a few paragraphs outlining how the proposed project will benefit the community and help promote ICT development.

Impact – there is an identifiable impact towards furthering the action plan identified in the National e-Pacifika Workshops.  Preference will be given for projects that impact the community at large rather than particular interests.  Social impacts will be deemed more valuable than the acquisition of hardware and as such this funding may not be used for hardware purchases.

Duration- the portion of proposed project financed under e-Pacifika is expected to be of short duration (not exceeding six months) and initiated immediately upon approval by UNDP/UNOPS.

Partnership – proposals involving multiple partners (private sector, NGOs, Government or other civil society) are highly encouraged and will be given preference. Proposals that involve cooperation between organizations within three or more of the countries participating in e-Pacifika are also encouraged.

Capacity building – proposals that will further develop human resources needed to promote ICT are also encouraged.

Reporting

Recipients of funding will be required to provide a status report of funded activities within three months of receipt of funding.

Evaluation Table

A committee formed and chaired by the Regional Coordinator of e-Pacifika will evaluate the proposals based on the criteria and scores listed in the table below.  The Committee shall be comprised of:  

Name Title/Organization
Mr. Murray Doehler Senior Consultant e-Pacifika  
Mr. Taholo Kami Senior Consultant e-Pacifika  
Dr. Robert Guild Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat
Ms. Miwako Takase First Secretary, Embassy of Japan in Fiji
Ms. Katherine Peart Regional Coordinator e-Pacifika, UNDP/UNOPS.  
Mr. Edo Stork CT Specialists, UNDP
Mr. Jeff Liew Regional Coordinator, Sustainable Livelihoods Programme, UNDP/UNOPS

Criteria Point   Score  
Cost-Sharing   Yes or No

If no, the proposal is rejected.  If yes, if the funding is between 40-65% thirty points (30), 66%-95% fifty points (50).  

 
Duration   If more than six months, rejected  
Sustainability   Maximum 50 points  
Impact   Maximum 50 points    
Partnership   Maximum 40 points  
Capacity Building   Maximum 25 points    
Accurate and reasonable budget   Maximum 50 points    
Proposal completeness (risks assessed, practical, implement able, workplan included, human resources identified)   Maximum 40 points  
Total Points Maximum 305,  

Minimum required 220  

 
 

 

Home ] Up ]

Send mail to transfsm@mail.fm with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2003 Department of Transportation, Communications & Infrastructure
Last modified: April 03, 2003